James Madison once wrote that if men were angels, we wouldn't need government. And, he added, if government were run by angels, we wouldn't need to place controls and limitations on government. And while Madison didn't address it, it's easy to speculate that angel-run governments don't need the scrutiny afforded by public records laws. But mortals run our governments. Transparency and openness are required.
In Coeur d'Alene, city officials tell me it's impossible for them to reveal the names of the 360 workers in the government's employ. The wildly imaginative reason: Names make it easy to tell which employees are boys and which are girls.
Two weeks ago, I asked the city to produce the names, titles, departments and rates of pay for all city employees. So far, the Idaho Freedom Foundation has compiled a database that includes the names of more than 37,000 names of state and local employees. But Coeur d'Alene has taken the unprecedented step of telling me that employee first names are top secret.
"First names will not be provided because that would indicate gender. This is exempt from disclosure under Idaho Code 9-340C(1)," city human resources Director Pam MacDonald told me in an e-mail. In other words, anyone can tell that Ben is a boy's name, and the fact that Ben is a boy is information that the public isn't permitted to have.
If the city's interpretation of the law is correct (It's not, but let's pretend) it would mean that the public would be denied the ability to know the names of people in all government institutions, including our schools. You could know that Johnny's teacher is Mr. Roberts, but you couldn't know his first name is George. That means you wouldn't be able to find out anything more about Johnny's teacher than what Mr. Roberts and the school district want you to know. It would mean that memos and other documents that contain the names of city employees would be altered so you couldn't find out who authored an important government report. E-mail dispatches from City Hall or your local elementary school would arrive with a last name only.
Boise lawyer Allen Derr, in an interview with the Coeur d'Alene Press, also observed that the city's unique application of the law could also be used to prohibit disclosure of the employee's last name. That would occur under the basis that it might reveal a person's race, which is also protected information under state law. But state law was never designed to do that. Names of employees have always been a matter of public record. Period.
But why is it important for the public to know a public employee's first name? Because the basic components of transparency in government can't exist if something as integral as an employee's name is protected information. It's impossible to track an employee's progression through an agency over time. For example, perhaps you know that someone named "Hoffman" worked for the fire department in 2007. Today, there's someone named "Hoffman" working in the mayor's office. Same person? Don't know. And there's no way to tell. There is significantly more accountability and greater odds of knowing if the records show the employee is "Wayne Hoffman."
And maybe when Wayne Hoffman worked in the fire department, he earned just $7.80 an hour, but now he's earning $37.80 an hour. A curiously large raise in just two years? I'm willing to bet that Wayne Hoffman is just that good. But the public should want to make sure. Coeur d'Alene's ruling makes it impossible to analyze an employee's pay increases each year. Are those increases normal or abnormal? Are the mayor's buddies getting big raises while good employees languish? You can't tell unless you can make comparisons, and no accurate comparison can be made unless you can match names. Under Coeur d'Alene's interpretation of law, it's impossible to determine if raises are too high or too low, if women are being paid on par with men, if nepotism is occurring, whether the employees who have been hired have the right credentials or whether an employee has a criminal record.
I have no reason to suspect the city leaders of Coeur d'Alene of anything illegal or unseemly, but government officials should be willing to subject themselves to public scrutiny. That means answering questions about the people earning a government paycheck.
The government knows who I am. Why I can't we know who comprises the government? And if we can't know, one has to ask, are we the masters of the government or its servant?
Wayne Hoffman is the executive director of the Idaho Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank. E-mail him at wayne@idahofreedom.net.
Comments
TransparencySubmitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 08/22/2009 - 07:39.
» - reply
I am a state employee. I don't know which to be angrier about - that my pay and my name is published for all to see, or that my team mates who have less experience and that I oversee some of their work while they get paid more. I have already been fighting with my employer about them posting my social security number- where other state employees can see it statewide. I have been fighting this issue the past few weeks, only to be told "too bad". So, now you post my salary and my name and there's also not a damn thing I can do about any of this. I will be watching to see who gets sued - the creators of this site - or my wonderful employer. It seems like your so-called transparency has taken a somewhat sadistic nature. Why not just post the personnel costs for each department, city, county, etc.? Tell me why should I support your efforts? I certainly haven't gained any freedom from your non-think tank.
As a hired (not elected)Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/19/2009 - 22:03.
» - reply
As a hired (not elected) government employee, but also a tax payer, I understand the public's desire and need to know where our tax dollars are being spent.
That being said, I completely disagree with disclosure of employee's names. It is a violation of privacy and a security risk in the age of identity theft. The pay for my position more than satisfies the need to know what money is being spent, without sacrificing my privacy and identity security.
The obsession with knowing employees names, not just the pay for their positions, goes beyond transparency in government, and has moved into invasion of privacy. People need to recognize that hired government employees are just that, hired employees, just like all of the other hard working Americans. And like the rest of Americans, we value our privacy and security. If the public are concerned about transparency in government, focus on the elected officials making the decisions on where the money goes, not the hired employees just trying to do their jobs like everyone else.
Here here!Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 12:37.
» - reply
Here here!
PrivacySubmitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 08/21/2009 - 12:26.
» - reply
Totally agree! As a state employee you have violated my privacy. We need to stop this gestapo activity now!
Transparency?Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/12/2009 - 12:24.
» - reply
Please make the IFF database of names and salaries of the "more than 37,000 names of state and local employees" available on your website. I am interested in looking at it.
If you want government to be transparent, then you should practice the same standards. And, afterall, it was my tax dollars that paid for government staff to put that information together for you.
It's call "building a website"Submitted by Wayne Hoffman on Sun, 08/16/2009 - 13:52.
» - reply
We're still working on it. Once completed, hopefully this week, it will be available for your use.
Public Records RequestSubmitted by stebbijo (not verified) on Tue, 08/11/2009 - 12:39.
» - reply
In the interest of some disclosure before this story bites the dust, I aksed for the exchange of information over this issue and posted it on my blog - local to Coeur d'Alene.
Hopefuly, this will be resolved soon and the first names will be disclosed.
Transparency requires knowing names of government employeesSubmitted by Sharon Oldfield (not verified) on Mon, 08/10/2009 - 14:31.
» - reply
What is the Coeur d'Alene government afraid of? That is rediculous not to give the full names of employees. Apply for a Freedom of Information! You will get the names. We are still a nation of laws and it is not lawful for Coeur d'Alene to withhold employees names whose salaries are clearly paid for by tax money.
How much do you make yearly,Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/19/2009 - 17:22.
» - reply
How much do you make yearly, Sharon Oldfield (if that is indeed who you are)? Who knew that working for the state of idaho would mean you'd need to put up a sign in front of your house so everyone knows what your salary is. Perhaps you'd like having all of your information plastered on some website so everyone can see it. You know, at this point you might as well post all the state employees' social security number and dates of birth, where they live, where their kids go to school... Transparency my ass, this is downright identity theft.
Post new comment